Search for: "United States v. Cooper"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 4,625
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2008, 5:00 pm
In Hopp v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:40 pm
In a short decision in the Newsday circulation fraud case, United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 3:27 am
United States, 531 U.S. 12 (2000), which was mentioned in the GAO Legal Opinion, IATA’s comments and ATA’s comments. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 7:34 pm
Mancia v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:27 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 6:51 pm
But, NTP had system claims and the court looked at 35 USC 271, which states: [W]hoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States, or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term of the patent therefor, infringes the patent. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 3:41 pm
Contents include:Guy Goodwin-Gill, International Law Association (Australian Branch) Annual General Meeting AddressAnn Kent, Compliance v Cooperation: China and International LawDonald Keever, The Regulatory Coherence of Multilateral RegulationJo En Low, Engaging with the United Nations Treaty Bodies: A Fruitful Dialogue? [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 2:02 pm
United Yarn Tex. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 12:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 6:17 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:36 pm
The case, Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:08 pm
[This case summarized by Leo Latella.]In United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:38 pm
Cooper and Dennis R. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:03 pm
[This case summarized by Felicia Sarner.]US v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
The problem with this kind of testimony, as the Second Circuit noted yesterday in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
United States v Roberts, 618 F2d 530), nor did her testimony usurp the jury's function to assess the informant's credibility (see People v Hayes, 226 AD2d 1055, 1056 lv denied 88 NY2d 936). [read post]
