Search for: "Washington v. Roberts"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 4,697
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
But many states operate under statutory schemes, or common law schemes bounded by statute, that limit full application of strict liability to manufacturers.12 For example, the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA) applies strict liability to manufacturers but leaves non-manufacturing sellers liable only for negligence.13 Other states employ “pass through” statutes that limit the liability of sellers who do not exercise control over a product, so long as the seller can… [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
But many states operate under statutory schemes, or common law schemes bounded by statute, that limit full application of strict liability to manufacturers.12 For example, the Washington Product Liability Act (WPLA) applies strict liability to manufacturers but leaves non-manufacturing sellers liable only for negligence.13 Other states employ “pass through” statutes that limit the liability of sellers who do not exercise control over a product, so long as the seller can… [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
Roberts et al. came down with one decision, Pearson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:18 pm
Business Development at JD Supra, (@JChristi) Monique Altheim, Brooklyn, NY, attorney, (@molecule18)Jill Windwer, NYC, VP Digital Products and Law.com, (@jwindwer)Mark Astarita, NY/NJ, securities litigator and broker-dealer attorney, (@astarita)Kathleen Scanlon, Long Island, NY, real estate lawyer, (@kasesq94)heckmanpage, Alpharetta, GA, (@heckmanpage) Unfiltered Orange, Austin, Texas, Orange Legal Technologies, (@complexd)Patrick DiDomenico, NYC, lawyer and KM professional, (@lawyerkm)David… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:54 pm
., in the Eastern District of Washington. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:42 am
Three Circuits ,US v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Three years ago, in State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 10:22 am
Roberts. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
To now say that a court has the discretion to admit evidence gained in violation of this right, due to a "bookkeeping" error, seems to be nothing more than an improper circumvention of an individual's Constitutional rights.For the Washington Post article discussing the Supreme Court's decision, click here. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:40 am
Robert Simon, et al. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
January 9, 2009 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM OF THE JUSTICE ROBERT H. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
Supreme Court was the decision to permit federal preemption in the Riegel v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:22 am
This time, he’s seeking an injunction from the federal district court in Washington to prevent Chief Justice Roberts from inserting the words “so help me God” into the inaugural oath he’ll administer to President-elect Barack Obama. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Parts I, II, and III of this series provided a literature review and commentary on the history, technology, food safety, and food quality aspects relating to the use of ionizing radiation in fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach processing. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 4:23 pm
The complaint (full text and links to Appendices) in Newdow v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
. * 162 BC: Eleazar Maccabeus was crushed to death at the Battle of Beth-zechariah by a War elephant that he believed to be carrying Seleucid King Antiochus V; charging in to battle, Eleazar rushed underneath the elephant and thrust a spear into its belly, whereupon it fell dead on top of him * 4 BC: Herod the Great suffered from fever, intense rashes, colon pains, foot drop, inflammation of the abdomen, a putrefaction of his genitals that produced worms, convulsions, and difficulty… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Brief in opposition (OXY USA Inc., and Union Oil Company of California) Petitioner’s reply Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-289; 08-294 Title: Horne v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:55 pm
"The Washington Post wrote about how Roberts had channeled his inner Mickey Spillane. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
