Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2010, 8:50 pm
It's not that we don't fight with prosecutors (and they with us) every bit as forcefully as civil plaintiff and defense lawyers do. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:11 pm
We don't have time to re-examine all the arguments in our Case B going back to first principles.5. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:38 am
Sheesh, in this edition we have judges interpreting statutes AND showing empathy.Now you know why I'm so darn happy. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 7:21 am
As we don't have a copy of the CEC's recommendation to the President, we can't yet say whether the reasons he advanced are intelligent and cogent. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:46 am
And these deals aren't always to the defendant's advantage. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:26 am
Don’t allow these esteemed justices to be ousted because of a single legal opinion. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Will we apply the same standard when antibiotic resistant infections arise because people don't finish taking their prescription? [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:19 pm
— Dylan GibbsTODAY'S DOCKET6 min readWhat happens when trial judges assume? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:12 am
That said, I don't doubt that Harper is right: in certain circumstances, particularly where the lawyer's income appears uncertain, flat fees can cause problems. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:48 am
Judging from the daily news reports, the skilled and aggressive defense lawyers are making a few points here and there, but they don’t seem to be racking up the kind of score needed to win over the jury. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 1:54 pm
Although judges have long since revised their jury instructions to include warnings about using internet sources, some jurors just don’t follow them. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 8:26 am
Societies that don't respect the rule of law shoot, imprison, disappear, buy off, summarily replace, or use some other illegal method to take care of judges perceived as problematic. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:51 am
We also don't know how he killed her, at least not publicly. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 2:57 pm
We don't know for sure, but there are very few seats on the market that could pass even a modest stress test. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:54 am
It is that culture of brutal examination of all sides of every issue, of pursuing the truth to wherever it may lead, even if that is somewhere one doesn't want to go, that has produced the scientific progress and civic virtue that are essential to the rule of law.There is a reason why student debaters are instructed to prepare to argue both sides of a question, don't know which side they will be asked to defend until they ascend the… [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 8:25 pm
The Supreme Court can't - or, more accurately, can't be bothered - to review more a tiny percent of their decisions, so they don't have any incentive to do what the Supreme Court says. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:49 am
It seems there was no consideration," he said, adding later, "We don't want total freewheeling judges just to make decisions that they choose. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:01 pm
Younger supposedly once said that the first rule of cross examination should be “DON'T”! [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Put another way, they don't need to have contacted the manufacturer! [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:13 am
I don't think anyone in the business would dispute that even a guilty defendant is sometimes entitled to acquittal. [read post]
