Search for: "v. " Results 4181 - 4200 of 493,737
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm by Charles Bolton
Under the Revised Code, a TMUD is generally defined as “a project that consists of new construction or the redevelopment, rehabilitation, expansion, or other improvement of vacant buildings or structures, or a combination of the foregoing, and that: (a) Will have a transformational economic impact on the development site and the surrounding area; (b) Integrates some combination of retail, office, residential, recreation, structured parking, and other similar uses into one mixed use… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:27 pm by Doug Cornelius
Sources: SEC Alleges Fraudulent Securities Offering of Alternative AssetsSecurities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:36 pm
Author Judicial Office Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commons  Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Melissa Clarke) Engineer AI Global Ltd v Appy Pie Ltd and another  [2024[ EWHC 1430 (IPEC) 19 June 2024This was the trial of an action for trade mark infringement and a counterclaim for invalidation of the claimant's marks. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:26 pm by Unknown
(Land Into Trust; Easement; Intervention) United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:58 am by Geoff Schweller
Supreme Court vacated a DC Circuit ruling in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblower case Lissack v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:52 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
On July 8, we published a blog about a landmark 7th Circuit opinion involving mass arbitration: Pauline Wallrich v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
Justice Wiley seems right to me when he says that, under the statute, continuous sexual abuse of a child doesn't necessarily require an intent to sexually arose one's self, and that whatever the alleged flaws of the jury instruction given here, they don't really matter in this particular case, since the only alleged basis for defendant's digital penetration of this child was to "punish" her. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:47 am by Lynn L. Bergeson
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its decision in Vinyl Institute, Inc. v. [read post]