Search for: "Anonymous v Anonymous" Results 4201 - 4220 of 5,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Jay J heard the trial in the case of Triaster Ltd v Dun & Bradstreet Ltd. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 5:53 pm by Shahid Buttar
Only two years ago, the Supreme Court held in Riley v. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 7:02 am by Molly Buckley
The Supreme Court has set this case, Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 3:36 pm by Andrew Delaney
This is not a K-Mart "blue light special"State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
Last Friday, in Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 16 (Ch), in what for him is quite a short judgment, Mr Justice Arnold gave the plot away in the very first of his 77 paragraphs:"In what circumstances can a trader secure a perpetual monopoly in the shape of a product by registering it as a trade mark? [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
Restaurants Ltd's application; opposition by Société Anonyme Des Bains De Mer Et Du Cercle Des Etrangers (here), in which Dermot Doyle, to the great and continued approval of this weblog, excoriated the approach of slinging the kitchen sink at trade mark applicants by raising a plethora of grounds which almost all have no substance whatsoever. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 3:00 pm by Adam Schwartz
These include the rights to confidentially engage in expressive activity, to speak anonymously, to converse privately, to confidentially receive unpopular ideas, and to confidentially gather newsworthy information from undisclosed sources. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 9:34 am by Paige Collings
” This growing legislative trend has sparked significant concerns and numerous First Amendment challenges, including a case currently pending before the Supreme Court–Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Panopticon has examined at the question of whether anonymous information can be personal data, and how to test this. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
On 23 February 2018 the Supreme Court refused Arcady Rotenberg permission to appeal against a judgment discharging an anonymity order. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The court found that the claimant’s application for an extension of time was without merit and maintained the April 2022 anonymity order, protecting the ninth defendant’s identity. [read post]