Search for: "BAKER v BAKER" Results 4201 - 4220 of 4,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2008, 6:54 am by Ann
Tom Hinchliffe was next to speak and did so on the recent case of Actavis v Merck which dealt with the question of whether the Court of Appeal could decide against its previous judgement in BMS v Baker Norton by which it should be bound. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:48 am
Much of this case was about whether the court of appeal could go against an earlier judgment of theirs (BMS v Baker Norton, to be exact), and in the end it decided it could, partly because the EPO case law in the area was 'settled' and happened to arrive at the opposite answer to what appeared to be the case in the UK. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:31 pm
Warshavsky, who will join us from the firm Baker Hostetler. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 2:53 pm
The Seventh Circuit's Judge Posner is scheduled to begin a bench trial this morning on the issue of inequitable conduct in New Medium Technologies LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:55 pm
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Chief Judge Baker, Judges May and Brown. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
09:29 AM September 05, 2008 from twitterrific David Keltner discussing City of Keller v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
Lord Justice Scott Baker at para 36, states In my judgment the law is clear. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:00 am
This caused him to miss meals during Ramadan.In Baker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:08 am
High Court (Technology and Contruction Court) Makers UK Ltd v London Borough of Camden [2008] EWHC 1836 (TCC) (25 July 2008) E Group Ltd v Baker [2008] EWHC 1994 (TCC) (25 July 2008) Richardson Roofing Company Ltd v Ballast Plc & Ors [2008] EWHC 1806 (TCC) (25 July 2008) Rodrigues v Sokal [2008] EWHC 2005 (TCC) (30 July 2008) Business Environment Bow Lane Ltd v Deanwater Estates Ltd [2008] EWHC 2003 (TCC) (31 July 2008) CJP Builders Ltd… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:26 am
Baker, in which the Supreme Court reduced the punitive damages award to $515 million. [read post]