Search for: "BOX v. STATE" Results 4201 - 4220 of 5,284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
As this is a motion to dismiss, the Court may look only to the amended complaint and any evidentiary material submitted to remedy defects in the amended complaint in ascertaining whether a cause of action has been stated (see Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, 275; Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633, 635-636). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:45 am
Any other interpretation flies in the face of the stated intent for construction of the procedural rules. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:40 am by Susan Brenner
In the United States, the venue is either a county (for cases in state court) or a district or division (for cases in federal court). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 11:43 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Having said the above, the next point of discussion with someone consulting with him would be to point out the case, Carlotta Ortiz and Mario Zepeda v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:31 pm by Norm Pattis
Blue called in sick today, causing another delay in the case of State v. [read post]
Payday Loan lenders could be sued in Illinois for failing to disclose the existence of an Electronic Funds Transfer [EFT] agreement in the loan disclosure box, so says the 5th Division of the First District Appellate Court of Illinois in the case of Randle v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:57 am by Larry Downes
  The Ninth Circuit’s ruling applies only within federal courts of the western states (including California and Washington, where this case originated). [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Another issue: controls—showing people a control may require endless rounds of creating boxes and looking at the boxes and fixing the boxes. [read post]