Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 4201 - 4220 of 9,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm by Eric Goldman
[Warning: Brutally ugly opinion and long blog post ahead] The evisceration of Section 230 continues. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 12:09 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Construing the Colorado Ski Safety Act of 1979, on May 31, the Colorado Supreme Court, in Fleury v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm by Francesca Procaccini
The government is bound to produce all of the statements made by the accused in its possession, as the statements of a detainee-defendant defending against capital charges are almost always relevant to his defense. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:47 am by John Jascob
Even if it were not bound by that precedent, the court stated that it would still conclude that Section 2462 would not apply. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am by Liam MacLean, Shepherd and Wedderburn
  It noted that the House of Lords (in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 54) had concluded that being treated differently due to one’s status as a prisoner did not come within the ambit of Article 14 discrimination. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:15 am by SHG
This is a peculiar vision, but Marbury v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 5:59 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court affirmed the district court’s judgment that there was no continuous movement of an unaltered item across state lines and insufficient evidence of interstate intent on the companies’ part (Mazzarella v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 9:45 am by John Jascob
The court did not reach the issue, raised by the defendants, of whether under Corwin v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 2:50 am by Marta Requejo
The Court reiterated that, when applying European Union law, the Contracting States remained bound by the obligations they had entered into on acceding to the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins, Pennsylvania Law Weekly May 17 2016  A riddle of negligence law has always been to what extent the orbit of responsibility extends outward from a tortfeasor's conduct toward an injured party so as to render the tortfeasor potentially liable as a matter of law.As noted by Dean Prosser in his hornbook on torts and as stated by former Justice Benjamin Cardozo in his famous decision in the case of Palsgraf v. [read post]