Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 4201 - 4220 of 12,893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 12:45 pm
Alternatively, a company can recover the amount of a reasonable royalty from the person who misappropriated its trade secret. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:28 pm
noted: [B]logging raises both your personal and your law firm's public profile. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:56 am by Kevin Kaufman
Company C, operating in a foreign country with a relatively higher interest rate, like Brazil, does not face the same restrictions. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm by Mark Bennett
If he does, the State will put A and B to trial together; C will testify that the person in the video is B; B will have to argue that C is mistaken and that the person in the video is A. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 11:17 am
Our initial thoughts are related to the practicality of complying with this rule, particularly for large companies that may spread  patent preparation and prosecution between more than one firm? [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Margaret McCaffery
There’s nothing wrong with B and C clients. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:17 pm by Randall Reese
P. 2002, 4001, 6004, 6006, 9008, and 9014, For Entry of: (I) An Order Approving (A) Bid Procedures, (B) Stalking Horse Expense Reimbursement, (C) Notice Of Sale, Auction and Sale Hearing, (D) Assumption Procedures and Related Notices, (E) Incurrence of Sale-Related Administrative Priority Claims, and (F) Imposition of an Administrative Stay; and (II) An Order Approving the Sale of Substantially All of the Debtors' Assets [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
            Is there really a legally significant distinction between the “ridesharing” companies and traditional taxi companies? [read post]
The Supreme Court disagreed, holding that “there is nothing special or conclusive about the bare parent/subsidiary relationship… the general principles which determine whether A owes a duty of care to C in respect of the harmful activities of B are not novel at all”. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 5:06 pm by Darrin Mish
• Medicare Part C coverage (so-called Medicare Advantage HMO-type coverage). [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:06 pm by @ErikJHeels
(Brighton, MA; Avonti Pinder, President) Azmar Management Group, Inc., (Boston, MA; Marisa Carnevale, President) B & B Masonry Construction, Inc. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 2:29 pm
The proposed rules require companies to evaluate in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) those risks arising from general compensation policies and overall practices at the company that may have a material effect on the company. 17 CFR 229.402(b)(2). [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
General Instruction I.A.6(b) also would not be available because the private operating company or companies would not have met the registrant requirements to use Form S-3 prior to the succession. [read post]
The Chinese company does the development at its own cost, but the U.S. company pays all hard costs for molds and similar items. b. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
 One significant difference in Side-C claims is that, unlike Side-B claims, a Side-C claim does not present any retirement of individual liability, but only pays for the elimination of corporate liability. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am by J
The process involves the service of a number of prescribed notices: (a) a “notice of invitation” inviting leaseholders to join the RTM Company (s.78, 2002 Act); (b) a “notice of claim to acquire the right to manage” (s.79, 2002 Act) (c) a counter-notice, to be served by the landlord or other interested parties (s.84, 2002 Act). [read post]