Search for: "Doe LLC" Results 4201 - 4220 of 28,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2008, 6:43 pm
Maxx of CA, LLC, Marshalls of CA, LLC, Marshalls of MA, Inc. and Marmaxx (collectively, “TJX”), and in which case the California Court of Appeal also narrowed the scope of claims available under the Act in ruling that the statute does not apply to merchandise returns. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:28 am
The LLC responded by trying to quash the subpoena on two grounds (among others): (1) the letter isn't protected by copyright, and (2) 512(h) does not apply to Tom Paine. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
In June 2019, Vitamin Energy was sued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by International IP Holdings, LLC, and Innovation Ventures, LLC, the owners of trademarks for 5-hour Energy liquid energy shots. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 9:27 am
The law firm of Shorstein & Lasnetski, LLC had a client who was injured when he was driving home from work in Jacksonville Beach, Florida at night and was hit by another driver who failed to yield and turned directly in front of our client. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 2:27 pm by Steven Boutwell
Comar Marine, LLC (“Comar”) sold four vessels to various vessel specific LLC’s ultimately owned by two members. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:17 am
The conflict management experts at OptionBridge provide a broad range of services, including conflict audit and assessment, neutral investigation, dispute resolution system design, mediation, arbitration, training, consulting, coaching and more, in order to minimize the likelihood of destructive conflict, intervene swiftly and effectively when it does occur, and help restore relationships and build healthier organizations in its aftermath. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:00 am by K. Tyler O'Connell
KKR Financial Holdings, LLC, 125 A.3d 304 (Del. 2015), Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III held that, in the circumstances, that omission and the directors’ approval of the sale did not suffice to plead a breach of the directors’ fiduciary duty of loyalty. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:00 am by Rantanen
Download 10-1382 Other judges, most vocally Judge Newman, take the view that a defense that does not "lack substantial merit" does not equate with a failure to establish a likelihood of success on the merits, and in any event should not automatically preclude entry of a preliminary injunction. [read post]