Search for: "Doe VI " Results 4201 - 4220 of 5,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, the supplement “c/o” was missing before the latter.[1.4.1] However, contrary to the [opponent’s] opinion, this incorrectness does not result in the transmission of the impugned decision having to be qualified as not directed to the PR of the [opponent], in violation of R 130(1). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
So, unlike mutual funds, the ETF does not buy or sell ETF Shares directly with all of its security holders. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
Only a misconception of the scope of federal power can result from ignoring this fact, or from assuming that this aspect of our fundamental law does not exist. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:43 am
The Court of Appeal's decision in the Dr Reddy case should now be the definitive word on what the criteria for selection inventions are in the UK, and it does not place any limitation on the nature of the technical effect, or on when it has to be proven. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 7:58 pm
Constitution (Article VI, clause 2), (2) the Naturalization Clause of the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 7:58 pm
Constitution (Article VI, clause 2), (2) the Naturalization Clause of the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:22 pm by The Legal Blog
The purpose and object of Order VI Rule 17 of the Code is to allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:47 pm by AdamSmith1776
  The answer is not to impose a one-size-fits-all top-down "reform," but to permit bottom-up experimentation (as Larry seems to endorse vis-a-vis the plethora of business school models). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:28 am by Kevin Jon Heller
High Contracting Parties (signatories) also must abide by all terms of the Conventions vis-a-vis one another even if one party to the conflict is a nonsignatory “Power,” and must so abide vis-a-vis the nonsignatory if “the latter accepts and applies” those terms. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:58 am by Lawrence Solum
In particular, it fails to consider whether the general scope of property rights and duties is, in fact, a side effect of the special structure of property (vis-à-vis contract). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:19 pm by Andrew Dorn
Disclaimer: This article cannot, and does not, create any attorney/client or consultant/client relationship. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by admin
  Normal people would presume that vis-a-vis rents, the regulator’s job is to prevent owners from overcharging, since owners can be relied upon to ask for higher rents whenever they think the higher rents can be obtained. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:08 pm
Similarly, on a visit to Bogotá last week, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper lauded the leveling of the playing field for Canadian business vis-à-vis competitors who have or are seeking preferential access to the burgeoning Colombian economy. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am by Larry Tribe Guest
 But fundamental questions of congressional authority vis-à-vis the reserved powers of the states turn not on what Congress had in mind but on what Congress did and on whether its exercise of power fell within the boundaries of Article I. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:20 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  One of the idiosyncrasies of the termination right, is that it does not apply to foreign grants. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:32 am by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Notably, the exclusion does not extend to family offices serving multiple families. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
[vi] A claimed process is surely patent-eligible under § 101 if:  (1) it is tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or (2) it transforms a particular article into a different state or thing. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
[vi] A claimed process is surely patent-eligible under § 101 if:  (1) it is tied to a particular machine or apparatus, or (2) it transforms a particular article into a different state or thing. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
A nonconvertible security is an ‘investment grade security’ if, at the time of sale, at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization (as that term is used in Rule 15c3-1(c)(2)(vi)(F) under the Exchange Act (§240.15c3-1(c)(2)(vi)(F) of this chapter)) has rated the security in one of its generic rating categories which signifies investment grade; typically, the four highest rating categories (within which there may be sub-categories… [read post]