Search for: "Doe v. United States of America"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 4,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
” The plaintiffs defined their putative class as including “all governmental entities in the United States of America who have been caused to expend monies" for certain drugs as a "result of the off label promotion by the defendants. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
From Russ Bensing at The Briefcase comes the news that Ohio's 8th District Court of Appeals affirmed a suppression motion in State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:27 am
"G-d protects," he said, "little children, drunkards and the United States of America. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
V. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Gear, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
The evil that Emperor Norton abolished, of course, was the Congress of the United States of America. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am
Brief of Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:40 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the Second Amendment does not apply to state and local governments. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
Background "There is hardly a political question in the United States which does not sooner or later turn into a judicial one. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Issue: Does 42 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Does Missouri v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:24 am
As the Times notes: "at least 75 percent of the bulb must be made or assembled in the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
United States Issue: Does 21 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
"Graham v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
§ 10(a).Although the courts have recognized certain common law exceptions for vacating an arbitration award, See Footnote 3 the United States Supreme Court recently held that the grounds listed in the statute are the exclusive grounds for vacating an arbitration award under the FAA. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:03 am
You can find his post here.In a nutshell, the decision seems to show a greater reliance on the punitive damages standards set forth in the United States Supreme Court decision of BMW of North America v. [read post]
