Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 7,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:53 am
… it has never been an infringement, in either English or EU law, for a person merely to view or read an infringing article in physical form. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
” Ohler v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
The official English translation of those questions is now available and the UK Intellectual Property Office invites comments by 10 July 2015 which might persuade the UK government to make representations of its own. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm
In Henson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:46 am
In today’s Leonard v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
Also, English proficiency was not required in order to perform any of the jobs in Job Group 070. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
” Miranda v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Elsewhere it won’t be changing either because the Member State isn’t interested or it can’t legally change. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
In her judgment, Laffoy J. made extensive reference to the English court decisions in R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC and Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
Finesse Wireless LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
On appeal, however, it was found that the mark had become distinctive, within the meaning of Article 7(3), in the German and English-speaking member states. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 8:03 pm
One of them, Sinclar v. [read post]
