Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
The Children were both fluent in English and are well acclimated to living in the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
She was a native Spanish speaker, and spoke very little English. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:29 am
This Court has applied that meaning since before Mississippi became a state, and the English were employing it in the Common Law when Henry VIII schemed a way to marry Anne Boleyn. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:21 pm
The missing reference is John Vallamattom v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Further, in NDMC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
An opposition was filed by Manchester United Football Club which, in its way, was the Tesco of English football clubs, there being many oth [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Solis v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
[2] Cojocaru v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
More were able to recognize corporate v. peer source but not near 100%. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 11:43 am
V (1780). [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:38 pm
Against the background of the Provimi judgment (Provimi Ltd v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
Nearly every founding-era English language dictionary agreed. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:14 pm
” Afro-American Publ’g Co. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:37 am
(The decision is available here in French, with a link to a Google Translate English version.) [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
On that hypothesis, it would have been difficult to defend the guidance given by the Court of Appeal in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc [2008] Bus LR 888 to the effect that the English court should normally refuse a stay of its own proceedings if it would be likely to resolve the question of validity significantly earlier. [read post]
