Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 11,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
As the decision was mint fresh and no English was available, Kat friend Tobias Cohen Jehoram provided a translation and a summary in English for us.Unpredictable times come with unpredictable patent decisions. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
In Lozano v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
Kentucky v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
Source: Apple Inc. v Registrar of Trade Marks [2014] FCA 1304 [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:39 am
Additional Resources: Grotheer v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:19 am
Donath v Trustees of the Second Duke of Westminster Will Trust [PDF] is a first instance decision of the LVT. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 11:30 am
Gilberg v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:19 am
Donath v Trustees of the Second Duke of Westminster Will Trust [PDF] is a first instance decision of the LVT. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
“ Interesting stuff; a useful summary of which can be found on the UKSC blog and Rosalind English’s analysis on this blog is here. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
English is another pro se appeal, but by a lawyer. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
For more on the judgment, see Rosalind English’s commentary in our blog. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:07 am
‘An English-only system was politically impossible. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:02 am
English program"; and "Court rules for seaman in dispute with ship owner. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
Second, when she announced her trip to Puerto Rico, the news releases were printed in Spanish and English. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
” Briefly: Amy Howe of this blog explains the Court’s latest decisions in plain English. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:11 pm
First, there is a risk that London arbitrators will follow the position of the English law in Jindal Iron and Steel Co Ltd and Others v Islamic Solidarity Shipping Co. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:20 pm
See Robert v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:06 am
One decision (Sunstar Inc. v. [read post]