Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 4201 - 4220 of 16,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:18 am by Andrew Delaney
Tax law is exhaustingVermont College of Fine Arts v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Drop drippers, solitary confinement, and hawks v. eagles.Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature from the Institute for Justice. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
China imposed more fines on the Beijing arm of Mintz Group, saying the New York-based due-diligence firm failed to respond to earlier penalties meted out over allegedly unapproved statistical work. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher, 115 AD3d 600, 601 [1st Dept 2014] [allegations that client was excessively billed and then threatened and coerced into paying the excessive and overinflated fees did not establish the “existence of a chronic and/or extreme pattern of legal delinquency”]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 2014 WL 3421053 at *5 [Sup. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:24 pm
  The Court of Appeal thinks it can do that just fine, thank you very much, and also doesn't say very nice things about the quality of the briefs by the respondent.The statute says someone older than 65 can sue for "elder abuse," and that term is defined as “[p]hysical abuse, neglect, abandonment, isolation, abduction, or other treatment [of an elder] with resulting physical harm or pain or mental suffering. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:13 am
  For precisely the resasons Judge Wardlaw identifies.Still, I'm not entirely certain that one-word objections aren't fine. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:08 pm
  Second, I doubt that laches is actually up to the task of preventing stale fee motions, as it'll be virtually impossible to show prejudice in most cases, and laches in any event does not provide a bright-line timing rule that both encourages motions by a set limit as well as grants the defendant definite repose after a certain time period -- all of which are definite purposes of a statutory timeliness period.So I'd have been just fine with the opinion if it said that… [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:47 pm
 (You might be thinking that that's an awfully big car, a minivan will work just fine, since there's only six of 'em.) [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 1:44 pm
 At times, those arguments include claims that may not be entirely persuasive.Which is perfectly fine. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:21 am
Emily sent him a text message saying she was fine and would call him in the morning.Defendant responded that she needed to call him immediately. [read post]