Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 44,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
“Marriage Equality,” as the New York statute is entitled, has been a hard fought battle.New York’s highest court held that there was no state constitutional right to same-sex marriage in Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 10:56 pm
Like a good plaintiff is supposed to do under Williamson County, West Linn Corporate Park (WLCP) began this odyssey in state court. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
A consumer searching for e-cigarettes, when faced with a mark with a reputation for clothing and jewellery, will not make the required link necessary to succeed under Article 8(5) EUTMR because the goods are completely different.The decisionEarlier trade marks with a reputation in a Member State enjoy extended protection in accordance with Article 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
(following Mendez) with United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:05 am
Miller v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:10 pm
Bass v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:52 am
Christie Brinkley Skincare, LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Alabama, a good faith belief in the invalidity of a patent as a defense in an infringement suit, and certification of a class action settlement resulting from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 7:25 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:15 am
A decision last week out of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
Bradley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In the first part, published yesterday, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Southwest Airlines v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:16 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 2:24 pm
In Appalachian Power Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
Rossetti Marketing Ltd v Diamond Sofa Co Ltd [2011] EWHC 2482 (QB); [2011] WLR (D) 287 “Whether a party was a commercial agent within the meaning of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the member states relating to self-employed commercial agents or the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993 was to be determined by reference to the terms and context of the agreement at the date it was concluded. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
I’m not familiar with this state law claim, but the magistrate apparently breaks new ground here. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:54 am
United States v. [read post]
