Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 4201 - 4220 of 36,754
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:16 am by Cameron Kerry
In June, the Supreme Court provided appellate judges with a neutron bomb against agency regulations with its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm by admin
Professor Schauer’s discussion of statistical significance, covered in my last post,[1] is curious for its disclaimer that “there is no claim here that measures of statistical significance map easily onto measures of the burden of proof. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This essay focuses on the strikingly ahistorical United States Supreme Court decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
(“Vale”), a publicly traded Brazilian mining company, with making misstatements about its ESG disclosures prior to the January 2019 collapse of its Brumadinho dam, which killed 270 people and caused significant environmental and social harm. [read post]
How would disclosure of this information harm an interest of the contractor protected by Exemption 4 (such as by causing foreseeable harm to the contractor’s economic or business interests)? [read post]