Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 16,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2019, 9:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:30 am
It’s not Marbury v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am
At Take Care, Leah Litman considers how the issues in Gundy v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:32 pm
This is significant because section 715.32(3) prevents the prosecutor from considering the national economic interest in deciding whether to offer an opportunity to negotiate a remediation agreement: Despite paragraph (2)(i), if the organization is alleged to have committed an offence under section 3 or 4 of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, the prosecutor must not consider the national economic interest, the potential effect on relations with a state other than Canada or the… [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
Sullivan, Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
Yesterday (Monday, March 4, 2019) a Qualcomm v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
The result: INS and DOJ built what they thought would be a better mousetrap in the hope that litigants in civil immigration suits would beat a path of retreat from the APA’s door. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
The result: INS and DOJ built what they thought would be a better mousetrap in the hope that litigants in civil immigration suits would beat a path of retreat from the APA’s door. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:54 pm
Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Association, and Hipsher v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm
The first is BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
" The AmeriKat will be there, so hopes to see you too! [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm
Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2019) EWHC 452 (Admin) (For transparency, I acted for one of the interveners, the Residential Landlords Association, in this case.) [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
Human Rights activists cheered last week when in Jam v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 10:08 am
(The Ninth, to its great credit, doesn’t know either).United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:01 am
I hope not. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm
O’Keeffe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm
To submit within 120 days a report on their plans to maximize the use of products produced within the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:40 pm
See “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018) and “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale” (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:01 am
Enough of CRTC Chair Ian Scott dismissing consumer concerns about the state of communications services. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
City of Irvine (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1110 (“Royalty”) and Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
