Search for: "In the Matter of Joseph" Results 4201 - 4220 of 5,431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
Mr Alan Newman QC for the applicant has accepted that the judge’s decision was right in some respects.It seems to me this was a sensible concession to make but there are remaining issues that are arguably important, and which may make it appropriate for the matter to proceed to trial”. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 11:19 pm by Admin
No matter the price, Hillman said she supports taking legal action. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:20 am by SHG
  It doesn't matter how much you want to give information away. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:47 am by Michael C. Smith
Joseph's Catholic Church here in Marshall will be having its first Red Mass, sponsored by the local Knights of Columbus council and assembly. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:49 am by McNabb Ferrari, P.C.
Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:49 am by McNabb Ferrari, P.C.
Douglas McNabb, Erich Ferrari and other members of the firm practice and write extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, International Extradition and OFAC litigation. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
  The matter is also reported the “Press Gazette”. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am by Law Lady
VANESSA MARIA CALDERIN, Appellee. 3rd District.Dissolution of marriage -- Arbitration -- Parties were not entitled to arbitrate post-judgment dispute regarding financial matters -- Arbitration provision in parties' assets agreement regarding financial issues was not enforceableFAUSTINO MARTINEZ, Appellant, vs. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:20 pm by Colin O'Keefe
I'd say the variety on this week's blogs is as broad as I've seen with the subjects they cover varying from video game law to employment matters to Minnesota politics. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Matter of Glick v Commissioner of Labor, 2010 NY Slip Op 07103, decided on October 7, 2010, Appellate Division, Third Department Joseph Glick was terminated from his position with the Office of Children and Family Services on October 27, 2005.... [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:23 am by Broc Romanek
Delaware Court Permits Stockholders to Shorten Term of Airgas Staggered Board - by George Bason, Joseph Rinaldi, Justine Lee of Davis Polk The Delaware Chancery Court recently upheld the validity of a bylaw amendment adopted by the stockholders of Airgas, Inc. at its September 2010 annual meeting that accelerates the date of Airgas's next annual meeting to January 2011, barely four months after its 2010 annual meeting was held. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:18 pm by Dan
The company discovered Beijing's internal logic evidently rules out allowing a foreign Internet search company to succeed no matter how accommodative it is. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:14 pm by Peter Tillers
Allen, Floris Bex, Scott Brewer, Craig Callen, James Franklin, David Hamer, Bruce Hay, Joseph Laronge, D. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:23 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
.), Judge Joseph Van Jura of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas addressed a Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine to preclude evidence of (1) Social Security Disability Benefits, and (2) worker’s compensation benefits. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Glannon.Glannon, Joseph W.New YorkComparative LawK5197 .R48 2010Rethinking rape law : international and comparative perspectives / edited by Clare McGlynn and Vanessa E. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:00 pm by Elie Mystal
Tyler Clementi* I’ve already shared my incisive thoughts on this matter via Twitter, but I think my “street-level hyperbole” about Judge Joseph Williams has its own charm. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
On October 1, 2010, Judge Joseph Van Jura of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas issued an Opinion and Order in the case of Glushefski v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:27 am by Susan Brenner
It is immaterial that the information sought may not be admissible at trial as `pretrial discovery extends not only to proof that is admissible but also to matters that may lead to the disclosure of admissible proof’. . . . [read post]