Search for: "JOHN DOE EMPLOYER"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 4,711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
EEO/iNewsSelected from iNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity, © 2009 John D. [read post]
21 May 2009, 9:01 am
An example of this would be an envelope addressed to "Deadbeat, Jane Doe" or "Deadbeat, John Doe"; (17) Communicate with the debtor between the hours of 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. in the debtor's time zone without the prior consent of the debtor; (18) Communicate with a debtor if the person knows that the debtor is represented by an attorney with respect to such debt and has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain, such attorney's name and address,… [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:10 am
Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; John W. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:37 am
In a second ruling on Monday, the Court ruled, over two Justices’ dissents, that federal law does not require an employer to set current pension benefits at a level that will make up for a denial of work credit for maternity leave for pregnant workers, when such a denial was not illegal in the past when it occurred. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:10 am
EEO/iNews of General InterestiNews Related to Equal Employment OpportunitySource: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:01 am
In fact, nurses are held to tougher employment standards then doctors. [read post]
14 May 2009, 8:28 pm
At the very least, one does not expect that his or her boss would be able to stumble upon this kind of information through a simple search on Google. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:45 am
("AEI"), which owns the right to use Andre Agassi's names and related intellectual property pursuant to an employment agreement it has with Andrew Agassi since 1994, sued three domain names containing the name Andre Agassi (andreagassi.com, andreagassi.net and andre-agassi.info). [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:44 am
Ct. 1951, 1960 (2006).Daisy Abdur-Rahman and Ryan Petty, inspectors formerly employed by the Department of Public Works of DeKalb County, Georgia, appeal a judgment on the pleadings against their complaint and in favor of their former supervisors, John Walker and Chester Gudewicz Jr. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
NLRB Law Memo 05/12/2009 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:28 pm
While there is no doubt as to the faith of the late Pope John Paul II (the first Polish Pope), there is debate about his lineage on his mother’s side. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
City of Chicago Issue: Where an employer adopts an employment practice that discriminates against African Americans in violation of Title VII’s disparate impact provision, must a plaintiff file an EEOC charge within 300 days after the announcement of the practice, or may a plaintiff file a charge within 300 days after the employer’s use of the discriminatory practice? [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:45 am
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT* Suffolk County Accused Of Discrimination Policy Towards Pregenant Employees. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:15 am
"Although in Halpin's case the GPS record was generated by his Department-issued cell phone, the installation of global positioning equipment in official vehicles is becoming common as well.When the Civil Service Employees Association challenged Nassau County's unilateral decision to use global positioning system (GPS) technology, a PERB administrative law judge dismissed its complaint, stating that PERB "has long held that the determination of the type of equipment to be… [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:28 am
John Desmond, Dana Witherspoon and M. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:23 am
If Souter does not turn out to be a home run for conservatives, as White House Chief of Staff John H. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:19 am
But where does that leave most employers. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
EEO/iNews = News Related to Equal Employment OpportunitySource: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 11:51 pm
Specter is already on record that his change is party does not equate to a change in his opposition to this controversial labor bill. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:09 am
To be sure, of course, the bottom line in New Haven is not why the Court votes one way or the other but that it does so. [read post]
