Search for: "Kat"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 6,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
As this Kat learned from Twitter, apparently so far the Commission has received over 8,000 responses, of which a 15-people task force in Brussels is in charge [of course the relevant hashtag - and likely trending topic - was #dreamjob]. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:12 pm
This Kat wonders how readers consider an entity like FB. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 11:18 am
” To this Kat’s surprise, it seemed that the other representative of TRAB at this point suddenly gave up the battlefront and turned to a new direction. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:49 am
But this Kat will do it anyway: one wonders here why the evidence was so poor – Orvec failed to get the right photographs into the case in the first place, leaving it to rely on a single image for most of the claim. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 12:10 pm
Another point that caught this Kat’s attention was the frequent mention of the fair use doctrine in various authors’ discussions. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
Kat friend and Fordham guest Kat, Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons) reports on the session.Over to Amy: "Klaus Grabinski (Federal Court of Justice, Karlsruhe) started the discussion by outlining infringement of second medical use patents in German case law. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
However, as Kat friend Matthieu Dhenne explains in the following guest report, it nevertheless provides interesting discussions on essentiality and the application of the new French Trade Secrets Act (following the implementation of the EU Trade Secrets Directive - see Kat posts here).Over to Matthieu who reports from Paris:"Are French courts ready to rule on FRAND? [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:21 am
Surprisingly (to this Kat at least), the judge concludes that claim 3 is “an alternative to claim 1”, based on a paragraph in the description which reads: [0017] It has proved to be of practical advantage if the optical beam deflector device 2 is disposed on the side of the inverting system 1 facing towards the eyepiece 5. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
With the fate of dance in copyright law catching interest in the press world-wide, this Kat decided to play some more with this improbable duet. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
Normally the IPKat is happy to leave recently-departed guest Kats to their own devices after they have had a six-month stint on this weblog, to give them a chance to recover, but one of the most recent guest Kats, who provided us with this post only last Sunday on whether merely offering a service constitutes the use of a trade mark under the Lanham Act, is back in action once again. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:57 pm
Here the IPKat hosts the third in the series of posts from London-based law firm Bristows (where guest Kat Tom works) on its real-time experiment in litigating before the proposed Unified Patent Court (UPC). [read post]
28 Sep 2024, 10:36 am
The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest post by former Kat Mirko Brüß (Rechtsanwalt Mirko Brüß) on yesterday’s important Hamburg decision on unlicensed text and data mining (TDM). [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 2:03 pm
He considers that trade mark cases are the most fun, including the Kit-Kat case and color trade mark cases, which are pushing the limits of protection to trade mark law. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 12:54 am
This Kat suspects the book will be a great resource for any academic interested in trade mark law. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am
To this Kat, the EPO approach to plausibility in inventive step and sufficiency is broadly consistent, and confirmed in G 2/21. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
This Kat is concerned that these are couched in entirely permissive (“The Court may…” and “the Court shall have discretion to”) rather than mandatory language. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am
Kat only eats kibble from M&S... [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
This Kat found it quite fascinating when she saw last week that Canada’s Supreme Court ruled on the question of whether the Government of Ontario, Canada owned copyright in a work created for someone else (home owners, developers and other private citizens who commission surveyors), but used by a government partner. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:08 am
Whilst most experts have cast their doubts on the success of the Fortnite cases (here), this Kat is inclined to think that the three claimants may still have a shot (considering past US precedents). [read post]
