Search for: "Level v. State" Results 4201 - 4220 of 29,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Christina Koningisor
The executive privilege recognized by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 7:01 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Dunphy recently released a decision in TSCC 2204 v. [read post]
Several portions of the bill already deal with various kinds of data requiring different levels of security. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 5:53 am by Russell Knight
When matters are truly contested on both the legal and the factual level, an evidentiary hearing is required. [read post]
  The Secretary of Transportation will convene and consult with a panel of national experts in rural and urban transportation, including (i) self-driving vehicle producers, manufacturers, and technology developers, (ii) States and State departments of transportation, (iii) metropolitan planning organizations, (iv) the motor carrier industry, (v) representatives of public transportation agencies or organizations, (vi) highway safety and academic groups, (vii) nonprofit… [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
The Year in Copyright: From Google v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
The court says that sending the August 2018 notice “was at least negligent (bordering on reckless)” but didn’t rise to the level of willful blindness. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am by Aaron Rubin and Heather Whitney
There has been much more legislative action at the state level, however, particularly in conservative states. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 8:21 am by Phil Dixon
Murder of prison guard by inmate at an understaffed prison did not rise to the level of a state-created danger for purposes of a substantive due process claim Callahan v. [read post]
” Judge Woodcock stated that she is bound by precedent set in HKSAR v Lai Chi Ying and Others and that a constitutional challenge is not appropriate. [read post]