Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 5,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
State Parkway Condo. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 9:09 am
Cooper v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
(Excess Copyright) Europe ECJ rules in intermediary liability case L’Oreal v eBay (TechnoLlama) (IPKat) (Class 46) EPO: Amazon 1-click application found to lack inventive step (EPLAW) (IP Osgoode) ISPs, academics and citizens oppose EU anti-piracy legislation (TorrentFreak) CERN issues open hardware licence for electronic designs (IP Watch) Georgia Georgian Authors’ Society opts to monitor unauthorised sales (1709 Blog) India Delhi High Court –… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
(Excess Copyright) Europe ECJ rules in intermediary liability case L’Oreal v eBay (TechnoLlama) (IPKat) (Class 46) EPO: Amazon 1-click application found to lack inventive step (EPLAW) (IP Osgoode) ISPs, academics and citizens oppose EU anti-piracy legislation (TorrentFreak) CERN issues open hardware licence for electronic designs (IP Watch) Georgia Georgian Authors’ Society opts to monitor unauthorised sales (1709 Blog) India Delhi High Court –… [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm
In Hall v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:47 am
The statute lays down that a duty of care is owed to visitors in respect of dangers due to the state of the premises or to things done or omitted to be done on them. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
” This rule was first articulated in R. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Note, however, that this figure does not include class action suits filed in state court or state court derivative suits, including those in the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm
That said, in the present case the bar may be said to be somewhat raised because there is an express term to the effect that the discretion shall be exercised “reasonably”. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
Grassi, 783 F.2d 1572 (11th Cir. 1986) that a component of extortion for the purposes of the Hobbs Act is the victim’s fearful state of mind, and that “fear” is “‘a state of anxious concern, alarm or apprehension of harm and it includes fear of economic loss as well as fear of physical violence. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
The SEC further stated that the staff had considered the 2010 report of a task force of the Committee on Federal Regulation of Securities of the American Bar Association on the use of derivatives and leverage by funds (the “2010 ABA Derivatives Report”),[4] which the SEC cites extensively throughout the Release. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to make an exception to the rule barring cameras from federal courtrooms for Donald Trump’s election subversion case and permit the televising, recording, or same-day release of video and audio recordings of his trial. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
I wish I had a nickel for every time I heard a student or colleague or member of the bar say something like, “Oh, math! [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others, (2009) 12 SCC 26. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court rejected plaintiff's claim that the ultra vires exception applied to sovereign immunity where her claims for injunctive relief were moot in light of Porteous's removal from office; claims for back pay and retirement credits were barred by sovereign immunity; and plaintiff lacked the necessary injury-in-fact to pursue declaratory relief. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court rejected plaintiff's claim that the ultra vires exception applied to sovereign immunity where her claims for injunctive relief were moot in light of Porteous's removal from office; claims for back pay and retirement credits were barred by sovereign immunity; and plaintiff lacked the necessary injury-in-fact to pursue declaratory relief. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:11 am
The possible unlicensed practice of law, observed the court, would be an issue for the state bar, and the appropriate remedy would be discipline imposed by that body, not disgorgement of her salary to her employer (Mosby-Meachem v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:01 pm
Take a look, for instance, at the series of goofs in Tennessee in Cone v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:30 am
But attempting similar arguments in respect of more established legal systems, such as the US, is much more difficult, as can be seen in another recent extradition case, Khan v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 1127 (Admin) (19 May 2010). [read post]
