Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 4201 - 4220 of 20,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
On December 2, 2015, the petitioner in the proceeding, the child’s godmother, Barbara T. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
On December 2, 2015, the petitioner in the proceeding, the child’s godmother, Barbara T. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 4:59 am by SHG
However, subdivision (b) provides the parameters of “materials,” and this video isn’t covered. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
And speaking of digging deeper, if you don’t already know, New York’s e-filing system has revolutionized public access to court filings in most parts of the state. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:27 am by Brad Wendel
  If that is the analysis, I don't think you really need 1.13(b) to give the lawyer permission to talk to the board. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:34 am
isn't that maybe copyright infringement??!! [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:03 pm by TDot
” … So for those of us still in law school, which approach ["what you know" or "who you know"] will matter more when it’s time to find a job? [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm by Keith Lee
I still don’t think many people are aware that they don’t “own” software. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Note: I can’t see why that matters, if the claim is that Armstrong’s “secret weapon” claim and not the other claims triggered a purchase.) [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  It may well be that a different image would have been just as good as the infringed image, but the fact of the matter is that the infringing image was the one used. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:00 pm
And remember, those callers and inquirers are clients (even if just temporarily) the moment they disclose facts about the matter. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:36 am by INFORRM
The blocking order was submitted for execution to the Telecommunications Directorate (“TİB”). [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm by chief
This is s.15: (1) A person (A) discriminates against a disabled person (B) if- (a) A treats B unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of B's disability, and (b) A cannot show that the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if A shows that A did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that B had the disability. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:41 pm by chief
This is s.15: (1) A person (A) discriminates against a disabled person (B) if- (a) A treats B unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of B's disability, and (b) A cannot show that the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if A shows that A did not know, and could not reasonably have been expected to know, that B had the disability. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:00 am by Liz Kurtz
Firm A created an environment in which associates competed indiscriminately for work, no matter what it was. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am by Lindsay A. Heller
(the husband), after (a) 30 years of marriage and (b) mutually dismissing a US divorce matter in 2017, which was filed in 2012. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 1:01 pm by Jessica Rich and Kristi L. Wolff
Misbranding Under the FD&C Act The FDA section of the letters doesn’t break new ground, but it does provide a helpful gauge for risk and a reminder about the importance of context. [read post]