Search for: "POST v. STATE" Results 4201 - 4220 of 99,779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm by Orin S. Kerr
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm by Ilya Somin
There have been several previous such cases, including three appellate court decisions, and Judge Ezra's own recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
I don't know whether the allegations are sound, but the lawsuit certainly bears watching.The post Battle of the Tech Titans, <i>Musk v. [read post]
The post India Supreme Court upholds state public employment policy barring candidates with 2+ children appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
Strict abortion laws have been prevalent in the state following the US Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:15 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Davis, and Rose James, Teneo, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: affirmative action, Anti-DEI, dei, Diversity, Stakeholders, Transparency Oregon State Treasury Nomination Neutrality Posted by Philip Larrieu, Oregon State Treasury, on Monday, February 26, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Director nominations, fiduciary duty, Proxy access, shareholder interests, Universal Proxy Rebellion extinction: Does Exxon mark the end of shareholder engagement? [read post]
The Alabama House passed a bill and the state Senate unanimously passed another on Thursday that would safeguard access to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) following the Alabama Supreme Court decision in LePage v. [read post]