Search for: "People v Challenger" Results 4201 - 4220 of 18,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Each day, people’s lives are affected by regulation. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The New York Civil Liberties Union announced the approval yesterday of a settlement in Lowe v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am by Amy Howe
Purdue Pharma, a challenge to the approval by the U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:24 am
That court ruled that DUI roadblocks did not violate a person's Fourth Amendment rights, (see Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by JURIST Staff
But let’s be clear – the American people must continue to use their vote as their voice, and elect a Congress who will pass a law restoring the protections of Roe v Wade. [read post]
1 May 2022, 2:49 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The enforceability of the clause was challenged on the grounds of ambiguity and confusion, that nothing in the release operated to excuse the school board’s own negligence, and that the holding in Kirton v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
If people cannot challenge government actions in court, individuals cannot hold the state to account ― the government will be, or be seen to be, above the law. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
First, we could not know whether the continued consensus stems from scholars’ not being exposed to outsider challenges, rather than from its continued scholarly acceptance despite the challenges. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
First, we could not know whether the continued consensus stems from scholars’ not being exposed to outsider challenges, rather than from its continued scholarly acceptance despite the challenges. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm by David Cole
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM As a candidate, Trump promised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
  He then took up the defendants’ challenge to the plaintiffs’ 4th Amendment claim, which was that “the school and its administrators violated Juliano's 4th Amendment rights by searching his Twitter account. [read post]