Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 6,180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 6:57 am
Morningware, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Occidental, and Sarei v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Occidental, and Sarei v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:02 pm
In support of this argument, the People rely on People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 5:25 am
A new era of teens watched it in reruns and memorized the lyrics from Zit Remedy’s sole hit, “Everybody Wants Something. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:25 pm
The decision in Reilly & Wilson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
This post is solely on behalf of the Dechert half of the Blog. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Just a note: many people assume that the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “excessive fines” is at issue here. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 3:06 pm
An unpublished decision also from the Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, entitled People v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:55 pm
The views expressed are solely those of the authors. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:45 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I read a very interesting opinion today — Cathey v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:54 am
The quotes come directly from the three major fair dealing decisions: CCH Canadian, Access Copyright, and SOCAN v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:46 am
This distinction was discussed in Ketch v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:13 pm
Under the "Dym v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
See State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:42 am
By Dennis Crouch Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) and ACLU v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:30 am
In the case of Cook et al, v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Written while Eldred v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Allegations of fraud are not the sole means for whistleblowers to secure SOX protections. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm
Another possibility: descriptive TMs having difficulty achieving secondary meaning because putative owner isn’t the sole occupant of the space. [read post]
