Search for: "Peters v. Peters"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 7,484
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2017, 4:37 pm
Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) David v Hosany, heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Bukovsky v CPS, heard 5 October 2017 (Gross, Simon and Peter Jackson LJJ) Please let us know if there are any hearings or applications which should be added to this preview. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” This morning’s second argument is in Peter v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
At Slate, David Gans argues that “[t]he sweeping arguments for a total religious exemption” in Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
Any such award would be aimed at punishing the wrongdoer and deterring similar conduct by others (see Laurie Marie M. v Jeffrey T.M., 159 AD2d 52, 59 [2d Dept 1990], affd 77 NY2d 981 [1991]; Peters v Newman, 115 AD2d 816, 817 [3d Dept 1985], appeal dismissed 67 NY2d 916 [1986]; see also Le Mistral, Inc. v Columbia Broadcasting Sys., 61 AD2d 491, 494 [1st Dept 1978], appeal dismissed 46 NY2d 940 [1979] [citing 14 NY Jur, Damages, § 176 for proposition that… [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
First on the agenda is Abbott v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
We posted previously on another referred case, Cadder (Peter) v HM Advocate (2010) UKSC 43, where the Court followed the Strasbourg Grand Chamber decision in Salduz that the Crown’s reliance on admissions made by an accused without legal advice had given rise to a breach of his right to a fair trial. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:14 pm
As Peter Gibson LJ noted in Starmark, the Court has to seek to discern “the intention of the parties, viewed objectively, with the aid of the presumption”. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Peter Phillips is here) In Theriault v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Malta Today has filed a constitutional application in relation to the case brought against them by Peter Fenech, claiming that there has been a violation of the right to freedom of expression. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Coin Geek has a piece about the libel action brought by Dr Craig Wright against Peter McCormack. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
Plaintiffs subsequently claimed in this action that defendants' negligent conduct had caused them to suffer from a condition known as Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS).Suffolk County Supreme Court Justice Peter Mayer granted defendants' request for and conducted a Frye hearing, in accordance with Frye v United States, 54 App DC 46, 293 F 1013 [1923], to determine the admissibility of expert testimony to support the plaintiffs' claims that they suffered from MCS. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
AIM Immunotech Inc., Politan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 7:19 pm
In the case of Balva v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:03 am
Harvey, Circuit docket 06-5126) but winning the second one (Munaf v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
Generally speaking, it is the former, as Schor v Spadaro 2020 NY Slip Op 30668(U) February 26, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 525714/2018 Judge: Peter P. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:56 pm
Twombly, (2007); Verizon v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:53 am
” Forsyth Cty. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:57 pm
Council, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:41 am
Papadopoulos v. [read post]
