Search for: "Rewards for Justice" Results 4201 - 4220 of 5,018
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 5:18 pm by Lawrence Gridin
The criminal lawyers I know tell me that although the challenges are many, they are more than offset by the rewards of practicing in this exciting field. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm by Marta Requejo
On September the 8th 2008, the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona referred a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:37 pm by Nathan
No chance of redemption, rehabilitation, reward for good behavior. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:00 am by Doug Jasinski
  To my mind, all of the above are reasons why the risk/reward ratio for law firm political donations is frequently too high to make it a prudent part of law firm marketing strategy. [read post]
13 May 2010, 11:39 pm by Rich Cassidy
I even saw a very capable and experienced appellate lawyer actually pass out “under fire” from the Justices. [read post]
13 May 2010, 4:30 am by Howard Friedman
Justice Kennedy’s words in particular and others like them from the other Justices caused me to act.8. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:51 am by Ben Vernia
Motivations - most claimed that they were motivated by considerations other than the prospect of a financial reward, such as integrity, altruism, public safety, justice and self-preservation. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm by Adam Schlossman
Niraj Chokski at the Atlantic attempts to predict how Justice Kagan might rule on technology cases. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:41 pm by James R. Copland
I agree with Ted that "a nomination standard that punishes candidates for taking public stands and rewards the Robertses and Kagans with cleaner resumes is going to benefit the left more than the right, as it's much easier for a liberal than a conservative to glide through an academic and political career and proving their bona fides without alienating anyone. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:09 pm by pfriedman
During his confirmation hearings, prospective Chief Justice Roberts was questioned intensely about his respect for precedent, particularly in connection with Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:20 am by Jason W. Anderson
  They are not moved as perhaps an advocate may be by any hope of reward or fear of punishment. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:11 am by Sheppard Mullin
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) from corporations who violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). [read post]
11 May 2010, 6:23 pm by Richard Renner
Instead, "institutional barriers stand between whistleblowers and justice. [read post]
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm by Daniel Solove
 Legal cultures can encourage and reward an instrumentalist approach to law, or they reinforce formalist practices and values. [read post]
11 May 2010, 10:59 am by Lawrence Solum
 Neither Justice Roberts nor Justice Sotomayor is a fool: they were not making foolish claims in their confirmation hearings. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:16 am by fraudfighters
  The whistleblower received a $4.3 million share of the settlement as a reward for disclosing the fraud to the Government. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:49 am by Ted Frank
While time as a BigLaw junior associate should influence one's view of civil justice (it certainly did for me), someone who's marking time until she can step on the academic or political ladder almost certainly had little say over her assignments or even the arguments she made in her briefs, if she was allowed to write briefs. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:39 am by Jeralyn
Seems to me his nomination was a reward for the OKC bombing prosecution which as Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General, he oversaw from his office in Washington. [read post]