Search for: "Rolling v. State" Results 4201 - 4220 of 4,418
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2008, 1:22 am
S 8314 Last Act: 05/27/08 referred to correctionS1702 ROBACH -- Relates to level three designation for certain sex offenders under the sex offender registration act Same as A 4449 Last Act: 05/27/08 ADVANCED TO THIRD READINGS3164 VOLKER -- Relates to the accrual of merit time by certain inmates Same as A 6150 Last Act: 05/27/08 ADVANCED TO THIRD READINGS3174 VOLKER -- Allows inmates in correctional institutions to work for, and the product of their labor may be disposed of… [read post]
31 May 2008, 2:45 pm
" When such individuals die before the CCA renders its opinion in the case, see generally United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:30 pm
Again, I don't suspect that this committee is going to try to send a bill to the floor anytime soon but it is good to get the ball rolling on righting the wrong of Riegel v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:30 pm
Again, I don't suspect that this committee is going to try to send a bill to the floor anytime soon but it is good to get the ball rolling on righting the wrong of Riegel v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
Patterson on the Rowling v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
” But even this concept has its limitation, as stated in R v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
  What I mean is, you remember yesterday where I asked a bunch of questions about that story where Mike Moore said he got a text message from Lon Stallings debunking Judge Lackey's testimony in the Jones v. [read post]