Search for: "State v. Board of Education" Results 4201 - 4220 of 5,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am by Amy Howe
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 2:17 pm
On June 12, 1997 the enterprise changed its legal status and became a State Joint Stock Company keeping the same title. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
This education role takes the form of guides, policies, FAQs, and sometimes even videos. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
The editorial board of the Broward County, Fla., Sun Sentinel maintains that the message of the court’s decision last term in Lozman v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2009) and Int’l Airport Centers LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
In contrast, Pennsylvania’s Liquor Control Board seems to have had better success dealing with attempts to avoid Pennsylvania alcohol duties.The upshot of the issue comes down to a simple administrative problem. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
A USCIS officer could no longer deny L-1A classification to such a manager because they were not supported by personnel within the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
In October 2024, the Law Society of Ontario (LSO) launched a consultation into a wide range of proposed governance and electoral reforms, including a reduction in the size of the governing board (from 54 voting members to approximately 30) and altering the composition of the board to include, in addition to elected members, members that are appointed by the Law Society. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:09 am by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court heard submissions last week on the proposed law that would ban TikTok in the US over national security concerns unless its China-based parent company sells the platform by 19 January 2025. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am by Dan Harris
Often, some education of your Chinese counterparty on this issue is required because Chinese companies often do not consider disclosure to a member of their own group as violating a non-disclosure prohibition. [read post]