Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
At The National Law Review, Brian Pierson looks at the court’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 9:32 am
Finally, Helmueller argues that the district court abused its discretion because the First Amendment protected his statements. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
See Doe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
Div. 2007), and a federal district court in Casella v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In Texas, the district court did not address 230. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:01 am
The court of appeals held in State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:01 am
The court of appeals held in State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 11:55 am
I will now discuss the Wuhan (Liu Li v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
The main problem with the first step in Mostyn J’s reasoning – even if he is right in law (which he may well be: certainly Sir James Munby, former President of the Family Division considers he is) – is that the Court of Appeal has decided otherwise in Clibbery v Allan, a judgment by which Mostyn J as a first instance judge is bound. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:16 am
Counsel argued that it doesn’t serve judicial economy to allow a case to be heard to its conclusion first in the Circuit Court, then in the Appellate Court, and then have to start over again because of improper venue. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm
There have been several previous such cases, including three appellate court decisions, and Judge Ezra's own recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
- Houston, Feb 2, 2016) Arbitrator (former presiding judge of the 11th District Court in Houston) issued two rulings, but the first one was not signed because arbitrator changed case outcome based on intervening change of the applicable law by a Texas Supreme Court decision. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:25 am
Madison, the seminal case which established judicial review, to the recent District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm
” The Court first ruled in 2008 that the Second Amendment guarantees a personal right to have a gun for self-defense, at least in the home (District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:20 am
Supreme Court on June 24, 2010 issued an opinion affirming dismissal of the Morrison v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:51 am
That rule cited here by Judge Wigenton (D.N.J.) follows two Delaware district court cases stating the same proposition. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
This has been the uninterrupted doctrine of the Supreme Court since the 1833 ruling in Barron v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:21 am
Brown v. [read post]
