Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 25,969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
This is illustrated by the recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Pirani v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:24 am
Hyatt Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 10:35 am
Following the lead of the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
In Cullen v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:07 am
") SC19109 Dissent - State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court case that upheld sobriety checkpoints (Michigan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
See Urbino v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm
Neither party disputes that, in light of the extreme animosity between them, an award of joint legal custody would not have been in the child's best interests as held in Matter of Cool v Malone and Matter of Yvette v Yvette. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:27 am
Workforce Solutions v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
(Lampi, LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:05 am
" The court recognized that there was no Georgia case law on point, but cited to United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sadallah v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 160 AD3d 1482, the Appellate Division found that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence, observing that "Evidence which would not be admissible in a court, such as hearsay, is admissible in a departmental hearing"* and "if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence". [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Service Law §75(1) provides an employee in the classified service of a public employer covered by the statute "shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges"; and 2. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
In so doing Carle sheds new light on how these early origins helped set the path for twentieth century legal civil rights activism in the United States. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Service Law §75(1) provides an employee in the classified service of a public employer covered by the statute "shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges"; and 2. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sadallah v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 160 AD3d 1482, the Appellate Division found that the ALJ's determination was supported by substantial evidence, observing that "Evidence which would not be admissible in a court, such as hearsay, is admissible in a departmental hearing"* and "if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence". [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:20 am
And last week, in Connick v. [read post]
