Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 4201 - 4220 of 4,682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
’ (Ars Technica) (Excess Copyright) (Techdirt) Report on Digital Music Forum East – ISP liability for copyright infringement (Media Wonk) (Media Wonk) Public Knowledge testifies to Congress on cable and satellite copyright (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D Illinois: Website not sufficient to create personal jurisdiction: Richter v INSTAR Enterprises (Chicago Intellectual Property Law… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 12:21 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAntitrustTying Charge Against Medical Equipment Maker Fails; Buyer's Actual Coercion Not Pleaded, AllegedSynergetics USA Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:26 am
Justice Stevens to Moderate Discussion on 'Marbury' Legal Times Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens will make a rare public appearance Thursday at the Newseum, marking the publication of a new book on the landmark 1803 decision Marbury v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:35 am
Such a bill would also encourage the creation of a 50-state hodge-podge of tort-based rules impossible for a manufacturer to comply with. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:59 am
After a month long recess the United States Supreme Court is back in session and ready to rule in Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
Hansing, et al., 09-686). ** Whether a state-created corporation, set up to perform some public duties, shares in the state’s immunity to private damage lawsuits (International Shipping Agency v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:13 am
Related posts: Study Shows That Commodity Price Rises Don't Justify Chocolate Price Rises; Chocolate Price Fixing Cases Consolidated; Retail Grocery Chains File Suit Against Chocolate Makers; Investigation of Chocolate Makers Goes Global; Chocolate Makers Allegedly Fixed Prices. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:42 am
  On Tuesday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court (somewhat reluctantly) ruled against a man who had a faulty Medtronic defibrillator upholding Riegel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
Lawmakers Seek to Return Right to Sue Device Makers, New York Times, February 19, 2009 Report: FDA quietly scaled back quality enforcement at medical device testing lab, Chicago Tribune, February 18, 2009 Related Web Resources: Supreme Court Shields Medical-Device Makers, The Washington Post, February 21, 2008 Read the Supreme Court Decision: Estate of Riegel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
Lawmakers Seek to Return Right to Sue Device Makers, New York Times, February 19, 2009 Report: FDA quietly scaled back quality enforcement at medical device testing lab, Chicago Tribune, February 18, 2009 Related Web Resources: Supreme Court Shields Medical-Device Makers, The Washington Post, February 21, 2008 Read the Supreme Court Decision: Estate of Riegel v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
In the Supreme Court, hyper-technicalities are most frequently used to defeat the claims of deserving plaintiffs, as in the now-Congressionally-overruled Ledbetter case or even worse, in Bowles v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
In interpreting the concept 'a substantial part, evaluated qualitatively', is the fact that a certain type of data allegedly extracted was obtained by the database maker from a source which is not generally accessible, so that it was possible to procure the data only by extracting them from the databases of that very database maker, to be used as a criterion? [read post]