Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 29,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
If you plan to depict people in advertising, you need both copyright and publicity rights permissions. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:39 am
Inability to obtain a timely waiver to reemploy a person receiving a retirement allowance from a public retirement system of this State does not result in a breach of contract LaSalle v Board of Educ. of Bridgehampton Union Free School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 02632, Appellate Division, Second Department Edward J. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:26 pm
Barkoff Following through on its plan announced earlier this month, Momenta Pharmaceuticals recently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in Momenta v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 5:18 am
Citifinancial Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
In Abou-Haidar, v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:39 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:36 pm
In McKimmy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:27 am
On Monday, the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit found in Miller v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:04 pm
On March 22, 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
The Branch Consultants v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
Friends of the Kings River v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
After weeks of protracted and highly contested jury selection, opening statements in the capital case against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev got underway yesterday, more than one month later than originally planned. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Anderson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 7:33 pm
For example, Section V. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
The court granted review in the case to decide whether to overrule a 1985 precedent, Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 pm
Hawai`i County Planning Comm'n, 79 Hawai`i 425, 903 P.2d 1246 (1995)) and Kalipi v. [read post]
