Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 8,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2016, 9:00 pm
” In Bellamy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:04 am
(image credit) Most noted among the latter is Brown v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:25 am
v=2TEia3QZ1ec&feature=player_embedded [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:50 pm
Abdul v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
United States (on circuits courts' power to enhance criminal sentences sua sponte)No. 06-7517, Irizarry v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 1:01 am
So you say stuff like, uh, ‘forced busing,’ ‘states’ rights’ and all that stuff. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:32 am
In jury selection, the defendant challenged the state's use of its peremptory challenges as being motivated by race under Batson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:34 am
A recent post at Time.com discussed how the US v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 7:48 am
Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), who chaired the hearings on H.R. 3721 in June, stated that Gross “creates substantially different standards across and between federal civil rights laws, thus undermining their predictability, scope, and effectiveness. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 5:12 am
In Kaita v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in SFFA v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
In April 2007 she commenced this action against the District under New York State's Human Rights Law (Executive Law §296) seeking to recover damages for alleged employment discrimination on the basis of race and sex.The District filed a pre-answer motion to dismiss Munro's petition on the grounds that the claims were barred by the statute of limitations (see Education Law §3813[2-b]) and that she had failed to timely serve a notice of claim (see… [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
But if the Federal Government is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, Bolling v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
Supreme Court case referenced in the Observer editorial is that of McCleskey v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:12 pm
” Rosenblatt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm
Wade in the Dobbs case also presages a reversal of Obergefell v. [read post]
