Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 57,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 7:25 am
Advocates spent Monday poring over the 5-2 decision in Britt v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 9:47 am
Following the overturning of Roe in 2022, Trump initially stated that he would support a 15-week ban with several exceptions, but eventually shifted away and said that it was up to the states to decide through voting, legislation, or a combination of both, as to what happens to abortion rights. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:24 am
After they were unable to pay back the loans, Bank of the West got three Iowa state court judgments against Walters and others. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:05 am
In Brandt v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
AMREP Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:09 am
Rita v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
Because he was not receiving a state retirement allowance, the County said it would not pay for Handy's health insurance in retirement.Handy sued, contending that under the Board's December 1995 actions he was "entitled to health insurance paid at [Schoharie County's] expense as [he had] met the requirement of a vested right. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, “[a] divided Supreme Court said on Monday that a Colorado baker and cake artist was wrongly censored by the state of Colorado for refusing to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding party. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:08 am
[See, for example, Bernstein v Industrial Commissioner, 57 AD2 767] and was subsequently repealed. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
This requires the restriction to respond to a “pressing social need”, for relevant and sufficient reasons; and to be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued by the State. viii) As with all Convention rights that are not absolute, the State has a margin of appreciation in how protects the right of freedom of expression and how it restricts that right. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:34 am
Driscoll v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Brandeis said the since wiretapping was illegal in the state of Washington, it was illegal when done by federal authorities outside of the legal guidelines. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:35 pm
That is essentially what the judge said, who handled the original scientific reliability hearing in State v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:53 am
One defense attorney who has brought these motions has said that they are granted about half the time. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
But my smile got a little brighter when I read this introductory paragraph of an opinion by Judge Kozinski:"It is said that every dog has its day. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:19 am
Spot on.That said, as Judge Paez forthrightly (and repeatedly) admits, the reasoning behind the second case is "less clear". [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:40 am
Case Citation: Doe v. [read post]
