Search for: "State v. Stevens" Results 4201 - 4220 of 7,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2011, 9:51 am by Ogletree Abbott
In the following case, the major issue was over communications from injured seaman Andrew Perry’s Jones Act attorney to Sea Subs, owner of the M/V Sea Sub III. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:01 am by Maya Angenot
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens stated in a recent speech to the Federal Bar Council that he would have sided with the dissent if he was still serving at the time of the judgment in Snyder v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, C. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:02 pm by Amy Howe
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at a recent decision by the Eighth Circuit holding that a North Dakota law which prohibited abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected is unconstitutional, noting that it “closed with a five-page lament: North Dakota’s law may be inconsistent with Roe v Wade and Casey v Planned Parenthood, but the Supreme Court should ‘re-evaluate its jurisprudence. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
 This argument formed the basis of the dissent to one of the key cases the FBI relies upon,  United States v New York Telephone Co., 434 US159 (1977). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Township of Scott, which overturned the court’s precedent on the issue of eminent domain in the state law context in Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
April 24, 2014) (distributor of generic drugs had no power to change labeling unilaterally); Stevens v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am by INFORRM
 We have had over 400,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, Australia, Malaysia and India making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:18 pm by Ken
As Patrick referenced, the Supreme Court recently struck down another censorious law in U.S. v. [read post]