Search for: "State v. True"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 21,811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 11:41 am
Midwestern Midget Football Club Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:32 pm
In Simpkins v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 am
The ruling came in Logan v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
The same is true of voluntary dismissals made under threat of a motion to dismiss for prematurity. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 12:21 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Indiana v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 12:06 pm
” United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:45 am
The only true admin law case is Gulf Restoration Network v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 1:54 pm
Golden State Advert. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:25 pm
Like other sanctuary cases currently in the federal courts, United States v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices express skepticism over using legislative motive in pre-emption analysis
6 Nov 2018, 8:22 am
He underscored the owners’ argument that the state’s true purpose was to impermissibly regulate those pre-empted activities. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 12:20 am
While the cash register contained money, the story does not state how much. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 12:29 pm
HomeLight, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 12:57 pm
On June 26, 2013, the California Court of Appeal (4th Appellate District) filed its decision in Wittenberg v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:37 am
The same is true for cases brought under the First Amendment and Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:59 am
FlynnOral argument is scheduled in the Michigan Supreme Court for March 6th in the juvenile lifer case of People v Raymond Carp to determine whether the SCOTUS decisions banning state juvenile lifer laws should get retroactive application. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:05 am
In a somewhat puzzling opinion in Mosby v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:40 pm
Last week, EFF called on the California Supreme Court to limit the impact of one these decisions, Yelp v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:30 am
Explaining that on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action under CPLR §3211(a)(7), a court must "accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory" and denied School District's appeal.* The amended complaint alleged, among other things, that the School District had prior notice of the… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 12:00 am
Supreme Court case that prohibits it, Batson v. [read post]
