Search for: "U. S. Appeal of" Results 4201 - 4220 of 6,195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2018, 6:51 am by Dean Freeman
This is the doctrine of joint and several liability, but it was effectively abolished with the introduction of Florida’s comparative fault law, along with the 2009 decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in T&S Enterprises Handicap Accessibility v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:41 pm by Norma Duenas
After the pawnbroker, R&J, appealed, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) agreed with and upheld the bankruptcy court’s ruling. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:51 pm by Ronald Mann
The Supreme Court sent the case back to the court of appeals, asking it to decide whether the statute requires paying overtime to the service advisors. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit 1999). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:25 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
[U]nlike typical restrictive covenants, upon which a prospective employee's position may depend, there were no consequences attached to [the employee]'s refusal to accept the agreement. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by Zachary Spilman
Granted issue questions whether the military judge erred when he denied Appellant’s motion seeking Article 13 sentence credit for the government’s 278 day delay in transferring him from death row after the Court of Criminal Appeals set aside the death sentence and affirmed only those non-capital charges to which Appellant pleaded guilty. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:45 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The Lower Court’s Decision and the Appeal to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma The lower court agreed with the defendant and granted her motion for summary judgment. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
When the consulate refused, they appealed to the Department of State, which agreed with the consulate’s determination. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:26 am
in Flaherty v Attie ;2009 NY Slip Op 51296(U) ; Supreme Court, Queens County ; Markey, J. we see what happens. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
The arrest here was unlawful and, therefore, must form part of the s. 24(2) analysis. [57] Accordingly, we reject the Crown and interveners’ view that we should adopt the approach set out by the Court of Appeal for Ontario in R. v. [read post]