Search for: "US LEGALIZATION INC." Results 4201 - 4220 of 29,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 2:21 pm by Keith L. Miller
These included Eagle Development Enterprises, Inc., Eagle Storage & Development, LLC, and Eagle Aviation Sales & Leasing, LLC. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by Jonathan Bailey
Righthaven is now saying that DU is simply trying to drive up legal expenses and is asking the judge to dismiss DU’s counterclaims. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 8:17 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm by Anapol Schwartz
Consumers are advised to stop using the strollers and contact Exton, PA-based Graco Children’s Products Inc. for a free repair kit. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a lengthy published opinion filed November 29, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal rejected all legal challenges to the City of San Francisco’s Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) and related land use approvals for a 488,000-square-foot multipurpose event center project on 11 acres in the City’s Mission Bay South redevelopment plan area (the “Project”). [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 9:35 am by Ronald Mann
  Specifically, Static Control contended that Lexmark had disseminated false information about the legality of selling printer cartridges that used Static Control’s products. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Sometimes certain documents that could be used in a wrongful dismissal action are documents that one party does not want to disclose. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:40 am by John L. Welch
Although there are situations in which intrastate sales may be found to have such an effect on commerce that may be controlled by Congress that the activities constitute use in commerce, see In re Silenus Wines, Inc., 557 F.2d 806, 194 USPQ 261 (CCPA 1977), there must be a showing that the activities have such an effect.The Board therefore found that Respondent did not use his mark on all of his identified goods as of his filing date, and ruled that the registration must… [read post]