Search for: "Washington v. Downes"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 5,954
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 4:55 pm
Good, because another one just came down the pipe, with Greg Mersol detailing Wang v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
In the 1983 case of Karcher v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:44 am
Dennis Henigan, the acting president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said in a statement: “Today’s ruling refusing to strike down any of Washington, D.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:43 am
Adamson had a 1987 Washington D.C. conviction for simple assault and a 1992 Kings County (New York State) conviction for Robbery in the Third Degree. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
Washington, require that we bring in the whole crew, so each person can testify as to each part of the total task? [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am
Earlier coverage of Maples v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
The case is Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:19 am
” Briefly: Robert Barnes of the Washington Post previews Tuesday’s oral argument in Maples v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Eric Schwartz, an intellectual property attorney with Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp in Washington, D.C., said the case boils down to whether Congress has the power under the Copyright Act to do what it did, and whether it was consistent with the First Amendment rights of the plaintiffs. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:04 pm
”The court struck down the plaintiffs’ further argument that an Iranian civil law, Article 26 of its 1928 Civil Code, makes the artifacts government property. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
., v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
” Briefly: The Washington Post has a short video of the Justices’ annual “class photo. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:13 am
Clement, now a Washington lawyer. ——————- A business trade group and two individuals asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to strike down the entire new federal health care law, arguing that its key feature — the insurance-purchase mandate — is unconstitutional, and that the rest of the law cannot stand without it. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
One v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:28 pm
Where yesterday it was Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
In Wood v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Michael McGough examines United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 2:43 pm
But that case, Thomas More Law Center, et al., v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 11:12 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Arenas v. [read post]
