Search for: "Wells v. Park"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 5,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2020, 9:46 pm
The Court’s decision Monday in Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
Shopping apps like Amazon or parking apps (I just used one a couple of weeks ago) are also allowed to use their own payment systems. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:38 am
The case is all the more striking because more than a century ago, in Jacobson v. [read post]
"No Cost" License Plate Readers Are Turning Texas Police into Mobile Debt Collectors and Data Miners
26 Jan 2016, 9:35 am
You might very well ask at this point about the legality of this scheme. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
” In Reynolds v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
That principle governs adoptive families as well. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
Kylie Grimes v (1) David Hawkins (2) Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] EWHC 2004 (QB) An ?? [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm
East Bay Regional Park Dist. (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 353, 366.) [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:33 pm
" Marshall, 909 S.W.2d at 899 (quoting Commerce Park at DFW Freeport v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
In Tobe v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:32 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
On 15 August 2015 HHJ Parkes QC handed down judgment in the curious libel and misrepresentation case of Burki v Seventy Thirty Ltd [2018] EWHC 2151 (QB). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:58 am
Evergreen Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
I don’t think there’s any incompatibility between this position and the position taken by the Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
