Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 68,827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2021, 8:19 am
” See Ozaltin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:46 pm
Cal. 2020) (currently on appeal), and State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:18 pm
In the matter of Gary Stolinski v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
Evans nor Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Supreme Court has recently delivered an important judgment in the case of National Legal Services Authority v Union of India (NALSA). [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under this Treaty, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:37 am
Ross Decisions in Buchek v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
However, the court contested this, stating that, just because this is an uncustomary rule, this does not signify that it is extraneous. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
- Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 8:20 pm
Elliott v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:48 am
The court explained that "Regardless of the merits in a particular case, a party whose rights are being determined at a quasi-judicial administrative hearing must be given the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses," citing Matter of Seeger v Moduform, Inc., 146 AD2d at 923. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:01 am
These are the kinds of judgments reserved to the states, and nothing in the FMIA requires states to make them on a species-wide basis or not at all. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:05 pm
Since Kullar v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:31 pm
Circuit sided with the plaintiffs in Halbig v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:38 pm
In my view, there’s a lot to be said for the argument that, all things being equal, it makes a lot of analytical sense in these cases for liability to be a question of federal, rather than state, law. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
Consider the Seventh Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part One
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
However, the majority decision to effect that the prescriptive nature of the balancing exercise in the Rules is compatible with ECHR, art 8 as being within the ‘margin of appreciation’ of state administrative policy is more problematic and requires closer consideration. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
In a case brought by Rights of Women determined in February this year, the Court of Appeal concluded that Regulations made under LASPO requiring victims of domestic violence to satisfy onerous evidential requirements directed at establishing the necessary victimhood as a condition of a grant of legal aid, were contrary to the purpose of LASPO and unlawful (R (Rights of Women) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] EWCA Civ 91). [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm
Very briefly, I direct your attention to Veera v. [read post]
