Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 8,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm
Let us help you win your legal battles. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am
On Friday, Zoe Bedell summarized the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights on extraditions to the United States: Trabelsi v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
In Marshall v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 3:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
” * The Blue Jay Trade Mark Battle Commences... [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:44 am
(The Ninth Circuit reached a similar conclusion in the Doe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 2:31 pm
See Delvoye v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
The case is Sanchez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
But see State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
Dudenhoeffer and Burwell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:41 am
Authorization of infringement was the subject of a heated legal battle in the Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd case (discussed more extensively on this very blog over a year ago) - the very example discussed in the paper as well. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
In a seminal case in North Carolina, Hinkamp v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
Judge Koh, who was made globally famous when she presided in the Apple v Samsung dispute, stated that to do so would essentially be going overboard. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
The second suit is Hayuk v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:15 am
Without reaching the free exercise issue, in State of New Jersey v, Graham, (NJ App., Aug. 12, 2014), the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division held that a municipal court judge acted improperly in summarily holding a defendant facing a disorderly persons charge in contempt. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:14 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an decision in State of Texas v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am
This news follows a recent ruling in Latif v. [read post]