Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 4221 - 4240 of 8,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 2:02 am
This is the question posed by the IPKat in July of last year, which was also before the Chancery Division England and Wales, in Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:42 pm by Goldberg Jones
Related Reading: The New Tax Plan and Divorce: What You Need to Know Separate V. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
Thus, Pike states [at 89] that a building per se cannot have goodwill because goodwill can only exist if there is something to buy in order to generate custom. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
The parties stipulated in January 2015 that his conviction was on appeal, but it has since been affirmed, see State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
His argument is that people who improve a property pay “a lot more tax” than do people who simply buy land and hold it, or buy land with run-down buildings and let it “rot” while waiting for the value to increase. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
A smuggler who legally purchases cigarettes in a low-tax area, such as North Carolina, and then sells the cigarettes in a high-tax area, like New York, still pays tax and buys American-produced goods. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
And finally, coverage of the GPS surveillance case, United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:51 am
Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2009) Favors: Employee Law: Federal Pullen Court: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Opinion Date: 10/19/09 Cite: Guest-Tek Interactive Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
The justices heard two cases in the 2023-2024 term involving guns: United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm by Stefan Passantino
By Stefan Passantino The United States Supreme Court has recently announced that it might be revisiting its uber-controversial opinion Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am by Peter Mahler
” The incentive is even more powerful when linked to a mandatory redemption or buy-out at an unfavorable price and/or on unfavorable terms for the terminated owner. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:11 am by Sherry F. Colb
I would insist that the employer buy leather-free furniture. [read post]