Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 4,551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Braman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:33 pm
When foodborne illness outbreaks occur, the source of the contamination is not always clear. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 2:02 am
C-08-00830 (SI) (N.D. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
(III) Home or community-based services furnished under a waiver granted under subsection (c) or (d) of section 1915 [42 USCS § 1396n(c) or (d)] . . . [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Stevens, No. 5:05-CV-33-BO(1) Decision and Order (Mar. 17, 2008), aff'd Order (E.D.N.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:55 am
(c) Interpretations of Common Article 3 and the Army Field Manual. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Conte v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
Take a look:[T]he FD&C Act and FDA's implementing regulations generally prohibit manufacturers of new drugs or medical devices from distributing products in interstate commerce for any intended use that FDA has not approved as safe and effective or cleared through a substantial equivalence determination. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
The bill retains the current $3.5 million federal estate tax exemption, freezes the estate tax rate at 45%, and repeals the carryover basis rules which would otherwise be in place next year. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:20 pm
*Thanks to the CAI Law Reporter for uncovering this gem of a case, Belt v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:40 am
Cheek, 2008 WL 4943132 (D. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
The case relates to an appeal to the Divisional Court of the Tribunal's decision in Heintz v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
Everyone assumed you would win the contract – but the fax says otherwise. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, as well as the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, also may exempt any individual from US-VISIT. 8 CFR 235.1(f)(1)(iv)(B). --------------------------------------- 2 Effective January 23, 2007, 8 CFR 235(d)(1)(iv) was redesignated as 8 CFR 235.1(f)(1)(iv). 71 FR 68412 (Nov. 24, 2006). --------------------------------------- B. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:00 am
, those that presumably are not their own and otherwise lack access to TARP money). [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
ROLAND D. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
(c) He draws attention to the wisdom of having such a case heard in the County Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:44 pm
See Dewsnup v. [read post]
