Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 4221 - 4240 of 40,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 12:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cooperation & Development, No. 2:18-cv-01748-JCM-GWF, 2019 WL 5578485 (D. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
  At a minimum, DOJ’s decision to allow Judge Kavanaugh’s assumption to go unrebutted, together with the failure to correct DOJ’s misstatement about rape cases, provides relevant context in which to consider the SG’s highly irregular allegations against Jane Doe’s lawyers.2. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:48 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Further they were never given a copy of the document.Further, contrary to defendants' claim, the fact there were other real estate firms where plaintiffs could have contracted to work does not necessarily vitiate the unconscionability, especially given the fact that as a CAR form, it is highly likely most if not all other brokerage firms would be using it. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 9:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
The defendants then contended that even if the individual plaintiffs may use Town Law § 268(2) to seek enforcement of this portion of Town Code § 198–21.2(F)(1)(b), it may not be enforced because the Town lacked the authority to regulate who owns or occupies land. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 7:00 pm
These options were exercised on November 2, 1959, following the issuance of letters testamentary on October 13, 1959, and checks aggregating $65,100, representing the purchase price fixed at $100 per share, were receipted by the plaintiffs by a writing dated November 2, 1959. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 4:35 pm
This decision does not open new grounds but it is a useful reminder of things easily forgotten. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 4:35 pm
This decision does not open new grounds but it is a useful reminder of things easily forgotten. [read post]
Part 2 of a series featuring our video Rules of the Road: Return to Work in the Time of COVID-19. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
Here, the accusatory instrument accuses the defendant of violating HPC §108-2, §108-23, §108-32, §108-33 and §108-34 as they relate to junkyards. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:26 am by Steven Cohen
Sommer should not be allowed to offer her opinion that the care received from the defendant while incarcerated caused or contributed to his death because her report does not adequately explain the connection between the two. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 9:09 am
July 2, 2007): The Fourth Amendment's protections do not attach to every visitor. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:55 am by J. Ross Pepper
In Tennessee, certain kinds of contracts are not enforceable unless (1) they are in writing and (2) they are signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought (the defendant, typically). [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am by Girardeau Spann
But deference to a political process that benefits the white majority by adopting Proposal 2 does not seem appropriate when the Supreme Court refuses such deference to affirmative action plans that benefit racial minorities. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 10:18 am by Eric Goldman
“Daystar does not allege…defendants indicated that the vaccination content specifically was a good fit or that the Acceptable Use Policy did not apply to Daystar. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 2:10 pm by Shawn R. Dominy
The appellate court concluded the officer’s failure to follow the law does not matter. [read post]