Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 5,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
And: They called nearly 100 hospitals and considered a supplier in Pakistan until acquiring 521 grams of the drug manufactured by Archimedes Pharma of Great Britain. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:55 am
You could bet $1 on the nice couple from Scranton and win a million bucks if they come out on top, right? [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Socha, 38 AD2d 22,24 (3d Dept 1971) lv dend,; 1 N Y2d 687 (1972). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
Jeffries, 10-CR-100 (E.D. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:36 pm
It is alsomutually understood by the Parties that all other costs are considered extraordinary costs,and shall be borne by the requesting party. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
The balance of hardships does not favor subjecting the parties to the risk of endless litigation about the nature, scope, duration and compliance with the requested injunction. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:37 am
Gagne, 448 U.S. 122, 129-30, 100 S.Ct. 2570, 65 L.Ed.2d 653 (1980). [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:35 am
Art 5.1 of the ECD reads: “1. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
One of the more delicate situations a professional representative can encounter is when his/her client does not settle the bills. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
Shoney’s, Inc., 100 F. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 11:42 am
Article 5, Section 1 of the Airgas charter and Article III, Section 1 of its bylaws each state that each class of directors serves until the "third succeeding annual meeting following the year of their election. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:50 pm
1. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:28 pm
So even though both parties spoke the language of the other quite well and even though both parties were international lawyers, a miscommunication occu [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:12 pm
Rarely, however, does anyone violate these rules without provocation. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
Cohen agreed with Westchester County that the petition improperly names John Does "1" through "100" as Petitioners.The court said that although CPLR 1024 provides for the naming of unknown parties as defendants in an action, it does not provide for the naming of unidentified Petitioners in an Article 78 proceeding.The judge also faulted the Association for failing to come forward with any statutory authority for naming unknown… [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:40 am
I’m not sure that Lord Justice Jackson does envisage means testing, but even if he did, the courts are accustomed to dealing with statements of assets in cases where a party’s ability to pay is in issue. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
However, the possibility of demanding a translation as foreseen by R 3(3), but only at a relatively late stage, - e.g. due to an issue which arises only in OPs - clearly contradicts with the need for the parties to have their case completely prepared for the OPs so that the case may be ready for a decision (R 116 (1) in combination with R 111(1)). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Having concluded that a trial court does have discretion to deny judicial reference in an appropriate case, we also evaluated the facts presented in the parties’ dispute and concluded that the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to refer the parties’ dispute to a referee. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
Defendants put the number at 99 or 100 while plaintiffs say 89.[2] The exact number is not important here. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:56 am
Based on two separate shareholders’ agreements, the parties consented to an initial board or four people. [read post]
